Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 2984 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 94% |
Arguments: | 2443 |
Debates: | 127 |
I am not asserting you did claim that, I've just found that simply refuting that which is given usually ends the debating thread between myself and another. By bringing up further points, I've provided a broader platform to debate.
-
Had these people jobs that were founded in their economies, these places would have the circulating economy we are so proud of. A developed society would in turn be more profitable for a globalized corporation, would it not?
-
Simply, I am claiming that there are better alternatives to oversea peasantry when it comes to the welfare of those workers and the company.
Your beliefs are strong and reasonable, but you needn't act arrogant. Globalization does provide jobs to impoverished nations, but it is not exactly benificary to the economies of those very nations. By having no minimum wage, the standard of living increases not exponentially, but rather minutely. The wages these workers get are menial. Additionally, the lack of regulation overseas ensures the lack of workers rights.
-
The profit gained by these corporations does not work it's way back to the 'host' economy. Instead, we benefit.
I suggest the best solution is to educate people on the urgency of this matter. This, followed by government mandates, will improve the odds of this problem diminishing. Additionally and/or alternatively, create landmasses in the Pacific Ocean.
|